Micro vs. Full Contracts: Which Is Better for Prop Firm Evaluations?
Most failed prop firm evaluations come down to traders using contracts that are too big for the drawdown. Full-size futures move fast and hit limits hard. Micros move slower, but give you more breathing room. The choice determines whether you pass or blow up.
The Core Difference: Tick Value
Tick value decides how fast you win or lose. Full contracts hit your trailing drawdown like a freight train. Micros hit it like a bicycle.
| Contract Type | Example Product | Tick Value |
|---|---|---|
| Full-size | ES | $12.50 per tick |
| Micro | MES | $1.25 per tick |
This is why traders attempting multi-account nonsense usually swing big — they rely on volatility, not skill.
Why Full Contracts Are Risky in Evaluations
Full-size contracts make prop firm rules harder:
- Drawdown evaporates fast
- One wick can pass your stop by 10+ ticks
- News spikes kill accounts instantly
- Scaling becomes impossible under tight limits
Combine that with execution issues during thin times — see low-liquidity session risks.
Why Micros Fit Prop Firm Rules Better
Micros give you three major advantages:
- More room inside drawdown
- Easier risk-reward consistency
- Less slippage impact
- More scaling flexibility
Micros let you run a clean evaluation with minimal stress on the risk engine.
Which Contract Type Wins More Evaluations?
Micros — easily. The slower tick speed keeps you alive longer and lets you adjust entries without violating trailing drawdown.
When Full Contracts Actually Make Sense
Use full-size only when:
- You already passed Phase 1
- You are trading with profit buffer
- Your strategy requires quick moves
Otherwise, micros are the smarter play.
The Bottom Line
Micros help you pass. Full-size contracts help you blow up. If your goal is to survive prop firm limits, stay small until you earn the right to size up.