Skip to article content

Floor function · executable risk · zero is valid

6Z Position Sizing: Risk Budget to Whole Contracts

If the declared budget is $600 and one contract's stressed loss is $622.50, the correct size is zero contracts. Margin availability cannot round that answer up.

Measure before dividing

Six Inputs Must Exist Before Size Exists

InputRequired definitionFail-closed result
Dollar risk budgetMaximum planned loss allocated to this decision, after portfolio limitsNo declared budget = zero
Invalidation priceA thesis-based level known before entry, not a distance chosen to force sizeNo valid invalidation = zero
Executable distanceEntry-to-stop distance rounded conservatively to the current tick ladderUncertain entry or stop = zero
Execution allowanceStressed entry and exit slippage appropriate to quantity and stateNo defensible estimate = zero
Gap/event allowanceSeparate non-continuous-move stress, including planned hold windowsUnsupported overnight/event hold = zero
FeesRound-turn broker, exchange, clearing and applicable regulatory costsUnknown costs remain a conservative estimate

Always round down

Calculate Per-Contract Loss, Then Apply the Floor

loss/contract = (stop ticks + execution ticks + gap ticks) × $12.50 + fees
contracts = floor(risk budget ÷ loss/contract)then apply portfolio and margin caps

Base worked calculation

Hypothetical risk budget $1,250; stop 36 ticks; execution 5 ticks; gap allowance 8 ticks; fees $10. Per-contract loss = 49 × $12.50 + $10 = $622.50. Floor($1,250 ÷ $622.50) = 2 contracts. Planned stressed loss = $1,245, leaving $5 unused.

Budget
$1,250
Total ticks
49
Per contract
$622.50
Size
2

The boundary cases matter most

Reconcile Whole-Contract Outcomes

CaseBudgetStop + execution + gapFeesLoss/contractContracts
Below minimum$60049 ticks$10$622.500
Exact base$1,25049 ticks$10$622.502
Wider thesis stop$1,25072 ticks$10$910.001
Event excluded$1,250Unknown$10Unknown0
Do not move the stop inward to rescue a one-contract answer.

If the smallest contract does not fit the valid invalidation and stress budget, do not trade, reduce portfolio risk elsewhere or use a genuinely smaller instrument if one is available and independently verified.

Inputs need evidence, not convenient constants

Estimate Execution and Gap Risk From Comparable Orders

A fixed two-tick slippage allowance is easy to calculate and hard to defend. Estimate costs from orders comparable in contract, expiry, side, quantity, session, event proximity and liquidity state. Separate entry from exit because a passive entry and urgent stop exit have different fill processes.

InputPreferred evidenceConservative fallback
Entry slippageDecision, arrival and fill prices from comparable submitted orders, including misses and partialsCurrent spread plus a documented adverse movement allowance
Stop-exit slippageTrigger-to-fill distribution for the same order logic and market stateWorse than entry; include book sweep at intended quantity
Gap allowanceTimestamped price paths across comparable scheduled and unscheduled windowsExclude the hold when evidence is insufficient
FeesActual account commission and current exchange, clearing and regulatory scheduleRound upward; never silently omit fees

Choose a stated adverse percentile or stress rule before inspecting the prospective trade. Preserve the sample size, lookback, data source and exclusions. If the estimate is based only on bars, it cannot claim queue-aware fills. If there are too few comparable exits, widen the stress or return zero rather than treating missing data as zero cost.

Tick rounding

Round loss away from safety

Convert the absolute entry-to-invalidation distance to ticks and round up. For example, 0.000811 ÷ 0.000025 = 32.44, so the risk distance is at least 33 ticks, or $412.50 per contract before costs.

Price uncertainty

Recompute after the fill

If entry fills three ticks worse than planned and the invalidation is unchanged, add those ticks to risk. Cancel excess quantity if actual stressed loss breaches the approved budget.

CME does not currently list a Micro 6Z contract.

The standard 500,000-rand contract is the whole-contract sizing unit. ClearPort's finer $0.50 price increment applies to the same standard unit and is not a smaller contract. If one standard contract is too large, the answer is zero 6Z contracts.

Size for adverse execution, not the chart line

Run Four Overlays Before Authorization

Liquidity

Spread and depth

Increase the execution allowance when intended quantity cannot be absorbed near the inside market; reject if measurement is unavailable.

Event

Gap and repricing

Model the hold through scheduled and unscheduled risk separately from ordinary stop slippage.

Lifecycle

Roll and expiry

Include two-leg costs when the holding horizon crosses the planned roll; block proximity to broker delivery cutoff.

Model

Parameter error

Recalculate at a wider stop and worse cost. A size that survives only the best estimate is fragile.

Instrument size is not portfolio size

Cap 6Z After Aggregating Shared Risk

A 6Z trade can share broad-dollar, emerging-market, commodity or South African risk with other positions. Correlation is state-dependent, so do not grant diversification credit from one historical coefficient.

  1. Group common shocks.Tag positions by USD, rates, risk, commodity and country-event channels.
  2. Stress co-movement.Assume correlations move toward the harmful direction during a common shock.
  3. Aggregate loss.Apply each position's stressed execution and gap loss simultaneously.
  4. Take the lower cap.Authorized 6Z size is the minimum of trade-risk size, portfolio-risk size and current margin capacity.

Close the loop

Review Estimate Error, Not Just Trade P&L

RecordPlannedActualAction
Entry and exit slippageTicks and source windowDecision, arrival, fill and benchmark pricesRefresh cost distribution
Stop pathTrigger and expected order branchTrigger, submission, partials and final fillRepair order assumptions
GapStress allowanceObserved discontinuityChange exclusion or reserve
MarginTimestamped requirement and bufferPeak requirement and equity lowChange cash gate, not risk budget

Keep rejected zero-contract decisions in the review set. Removing them hides how often contract granularity prevents exposure and can make later capacity estimates look unrealistically generous.

Final authorization

Risk size 2, portfolio cap 1, margin cap 3 means trade 1

The smallest independent cap controls. If any cap is zero or unknown, the final size is zero.

Sources, methods and editorial disclosure — reviewed August 25, 2026

All budgets, stops, costs and results are hypothetical arithmetic. No optimal risk percentage, typical stop, slippage distribution or profitability is claimed. Stops and stress reserves cannot guarantee a maximum loss.